Your Feedback Matters


We hope you are enjoying The Foundation Stone™.
Please take a few moments to complete the survey
so that we can continue to improve our website.
Thank you for your time and support.

Take this survey



Your Feedback Matters


Please reconsider your decision.
A few minutes of your time will be
a great help and will allow us to make
The Foundation Stone™ even better.

Thank You!

Take this survey


Reading The Text: Hannah's Barrenness: Part II, Chapter 1 Print E-mail
Written by Michael Linetsky   

TextThe Foundation Stone is honored and thrilled to present this new series Reading The Text by Michael Linetsky: The purpose of this column is to explore the literary art of the

Scripture. The Biblical narrative says much more than what its explicit words express. An entire subliminal story runs in parallel with the superficial story line. Unlike the latter, the former can only been read by listening, not to what the text say, but what it could have said and did not, as well. In this column we intend to bring to the fore some of the hidden story in the Scripture.

Part II, Chapter 1

Hannah’s barrenness is initially presented as a natural event, "she is childless" (v. 2) but what happens now is that it is twice attributed to God, "because God closed her womb". One finds this attribution completely uncharacteristic taking into account that no where else in the Scripture does God close a woman's womb; He only opens it as he does Leah’s (Gen. 29:31) and Rachel’s womb (Gen. 30:22). In the main, the Scripture tends to shy away from ascribing to God unpleasant acts towards His people. The Scripture will explicitly attribute the defeat of the Philistines to God but will only hint at God’s involvement when the Israelites are defeated. And so, Sarah herself says: "Look, the Lord has kept me from bearing" (Gen. 16:2) but the Scripture removes any ascription to God: "Sarai, Abraham’s wife had borne him no children (Gen. 16:1).   

Looking forward in our Text we see that the timing of Hannah's barrenness and the degradation of the Priesthood at the Temple of Shiloh is hardly a coincidence. Hannah’s barrenness is impetus which leads to the birth of her son Samuel is that is in a sense to "supplant" and remedy this corrupt priesthood. God's hand and participation in the closing of Hannah's womb is therefore made unreservedly explicit.

About The Author

Michael Linetsky, attended YU, has studied and written numerous articles on the philosophy of Rav Saadiah Gaon, Ibn Ezra and Medieval Judaeo-Arabic biblical exegesis. His books: "Rabbi Abraham Ibn Ezra's commentary on the Creation", and "Rabbi Saadiah Gaon's commentary on Genesis" was published by Jason Aronson. He is currently working on the Jerusalem Talmud and Halachic Midrashim in order to investigate its phenomenology. He is married to Sharona Glecer and has three children Yossi, Shmuel and Devorah.

Share/Save/Bookmark
 
Joomla 1.5 Templates by JoomlaShine.com